have been thinking further about the 'truly or dutifully shaken' part of
this debate, its 'intellectual' or 'honest' rigor.
I've just been listening to some ostensibly discordant string quartet music
by Peter Maxwell Davies. Am I enjoying this becuase I am enjoying this? Or
am I enjoying this for different or intangible reasons?
I often disagree with the *degree* of
implication that an author's view is authoritative. It's immediately
suspicious that
'author' is the root of 'authoritative'! The author shouldn't really give a
view
that may colour his work beyond the text provided already by him to
convey its
own authoritativeness...UNLESS he is creating a new work in the process.